Started By
Message

re: Anthony Grant will return, per Cecil Hurt

Posted on 3/18/14 at 10:07 pm to
Posted by BigBird09
Member since May 2012
5920 posts
Posted on 3/18/14 at 10:07 pm to
People need to stop laying all the blame on Battle. Keeping Grant wasn't one man's decision. If we switched ADs with AU, we'd be in the same boat and so would they. AU had 4 losing seasons and finished 49-75 in Barbee's tenure. That's with them playing nobodies in their non-conference schedule year in and year out. They made a change because they HAD to.
This post was edited on 3/18/14 at 10:08 pm
Posted by Ol'DirtyCam
Madtown
Member since Jul 2013
1167 posts
Posted on 3/18/14 at 11:35 pm to
We can't really blame Battle on this one. Grant (most likely) was kept this year because of his excessive buyout. If we didn't owe Grant a ton of money we would have let him go after this season. I believe he signed that extension under coach Moore. If that was under Battle's tenure then that is on him, but I think that was on coach Moore. If Battle doesn't even have enough pull to fire a coach that sucks because he was one of Mal Moore's guys then we need to fire him and get a real AD (not some pass the torch type guy).
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter