re: moral equivalency? hunh vs flopping

I think officials actually have very wide latitude to make decisions with respect to how to penalize an unfair act - but I don't think that makes sense (because it leads to irregular enforcement and penalties which are unfair to teams who receive more significant penalties).

Anyway, I feel like that discussion has already been had in this thread. If it wasn't clear to the reader - this is why I think it would make more sense to think about how to enforce the rules and apply penalties which are consistent instead of having irregular and unfair outcomes.