Started By
Message
re: moral equivalency? hunh vs flopping
Posted on 3/9/14 at 3:34 pm to beatbammer
Posted on 3/9/14 at 3:34 pm to beatbammer
So, let me get this straight, all the people who come from HUNH offense want to regulate onfield injury timeouts whether they be true or false. Whose wanting to change the rules now?
Give another advantage to the offense is what they're saying. What do you need defense for? That's right API, you just need an average or sub-par defense to compete against the best with the best. Why have a complete team!
I think it's a little bit hypocritical to complain and cry about the 10 second rule, then come in here and want to regulate injury timeouts. You people want your cake and it it, too!
Give another advantage to the offense is what they're saying. What do you need defense for? That's right API, you just need an average or sub-par defense to compete against the best with the best. Why have a complete team!
I think it's a little bit hypocritical to complain and cry about the 10 second rule, then come in here and want to regulate injury timeouts. You people want your cake and it it, too!
1
Posted on 3/9/14 at 5:39 pm to bamamonty
quote:
So, let me get this straight, all the people who come from HUNH offense want to regulate onfield injury timeouts whether they be true or false. Whose wanting to change the rules now?
Give another advantage to the offense is what they're saying. What do you need defense for? That's right API, you just need an average or sub-par defense to compete against the best with the best. Why have a complete team!
I think it's a little bit hypocritical to complain and cry about the 10 second rule, then come in here and want to regulate injury timeouts. You people want your cake and it it, too!
Where in my post did I advocate for regulating injury timeouts?
But I'll have to give it to you that you set-up one helluva strawman and you knocked that sucker flat.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News