Started By
Message
re: A Redditor's Objective Mathematical SEC HC Ranking
Posted on 3/6/14 at 11:17 am to randomways
Posted on 3/6/14 at 11:17 am to randomways
quote:We get it.
No...not both years?!? Even the one spent at a lower tier school against non-SEC competition? That completely undercuts the objections.
You hate the rankings. I didn't do them. I don't fricking care what you think.
All I did was correct Lobster on his false statement.
There you go sport. Random bolding for your comprehension.
1
Posted on 3/6/14 at 11:25 am to joeyb147
quote:
We get it.
You hate the rankings. I didn't do them. I don't fricking care what you think.
All I did was correct Lobster on his false statement.
There you go sport. Random bolding for your comprehension.
You corrected it as if it meant anything substantial. And your "random" bolding is highly inefficient. You should work on going with a large enough sample size to get words like "fricking" and "sport" bolded for better emphasis.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News