Started By
Message

re: SEC Network, the thread

Posted on 7/18/14 at 12:14 am to
Posted by tmc94
Member since Sep 2012
11559 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 12:14 am to
I agree with your general premise, but you have several ifs in there that make me skeptical.
quote:

if they're reaching agreements with virtually everyone

except to this point, they haven't. The facts are only ATT, Dish, and Cox have signed on among the real players. And they are all on the smaller side. The rest is merely hearsay.
quote:

If these agreements are for any length of time

We don't know this either. I'm pretty sure the Dish deal was longer and more comprehensive since it included all parts of Disney (and online content). But the others are just one-offs that could be any terms.

I'm obviously not privy to the discussions, but a lowball 1-year deal is not abnormal for new channels with the agreement that a good-faith negotiation takes place once ratings/demand are established. Sweetheart deals with early adopters (with several providers) is not a bad idea to put pressure on others by giving consumers options.

Too many assumptions are being taken as fact right now imo
Posted by tmc94
Member since Sep 2012
11559 posts
Posted on 7/18/14 at 9:58 am to
welp, that memo appears accurate. Major news media is tweeting that Sports Business Daily is about to drop that announcement in the next hour or so
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter