Started By
Message

re: SEC Network, the thread

Posted on 3/6/14 at 2:52 pm to
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58178 posts
Posted on 3/6/14 at 2:52 pm to
I know I've said it in other threads but Pac 12 Net would probably be on DTV if it wasn't 6 regional networks plus a national feed.

Almost all the football games are simulcast on the national feed so why would DTV care about a bunch of other regional sports nets that don't have anything past a few college basketball games to offer?

This post was edited on 3/6/14 at 2:54 pm
Posted by tmc94
Member since Sep 2012
11559 posts
Posted on 3/24/14 at 5:45 am to
quote:

Almost all the football games are simulcast on the national feed so why would DTV care about a bunch of other regional sports nets that don't have anything past a few college basketball games to offer?

I found this quote to be incredibly fascinating

LINK
quote:

Further, the contract now resets all the Pac-12 Network carriage fees should the network agree to a deal with DirecTV that is below what others are currently paying. The others would get a lower negotiated rate that matches DirecTV. While I blame both sides, I'm now wondering if the conference's claim that DirecTV doesn't want to come to the table is really just the conference's way of saying they don't want to give up money already in the bank chasing wider distribution.

I wonder how common this is. It makes sense because if I'm an early adopter, I'm pissed if my biggest competitor gets a better rate. Makes me wonder if this is similar reasoning as to why LHN is supposedly being left out of the new DTV-Disney deal.

And it may also be what the Disney folks are saying about "learning from past mistakes" when talking about SECN.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter