Started By
Message
re: Haters Said UT Didn't Have A Chance In Hell.......
Posted on 2/6/14 at 2:03 pm to TheCheshireHog
Posted on 2/6/14 at 2:03 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
You are correct. While it's a very good class, it is only top 10 due to quantity and not overall quality. It would be around 15 if you went by actually player average.
The player average rating was 89.34 (according to the 24/7 composite average). That would put UT's class at #13 nationally by player average. That would put UT behind Bama, LSU, aTm, UGA, AU and UF.
That being said...if you were going to field a football team, would you rather have 21 players with an average score of 90.7 or 32 players with an average score of 89.3? If you already have plenty of depth, then you can focus solely on individual player quality. If you need to add depth, then you need both quality and quantity.
UT had an excellent class. Most importantly...they filled spots of need.
This post was edited on 2/6/14 at 2:05 pm
1
Posted on 2/6/14 at 2:09 pm to madmaxvol
quote:
The player average rating was 89.34 (according to the 24/7 composite average). That would put UT's class at #13 nationally by player average.
Well look at that. Not top 10.
Perhaps your fellow posters should learn how to sort a rankings list.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News