Started By
Message
re: 12th Man and "Why not us," both stolen from the SEC ...
Posted on 2/3/14 at 10:08 am to scrooster
Posted on 2/3/14 at 10:08 am to scrooster
The trademark issue has been put to rest. Seattle is not stealing our trademark. They are under a licensing agreement to use it. They paid. They get to use it. No theft involved.
Now, for those who are claiming that Seattle should own the trademark, you can kiss that one goodbye for 2 reasons:
1. Seattle admitted that A&M owns the trademark by signing the licensing agreement.
2. A&M was using it way before Seattle, despite what Randy Dook says. A&M was referring to itself as the 12th Man in 1939 at the latest. Seattle Seahawks organization was not even in existence until June 4, 1974.
So, frick each and every last one of you motherfrickers. We are the REAL 12th Man.
Now, for those who are claiming that Seattle should own the trademark, you can kiss that one goodbye for 2 reasons:
1. Seattle admitted that A&M owns the trademark by signing the licensing agreement.
2. A&M was using it way before Seattle, despite what Randy Dook says. A&M was referring to itself as the 12th Man in 1939 at the latest. Seattle Seahawks organization was not even in existence until June 4, 1974.
So, frick each and every last one of you motherfrickers. We are the REAL 12th Man.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News