Started By
Message
locked post

AU and USCe-Is it the shoes?

Posted on 1/18/14 at 9:21 pm
Posted by marshallcotiger
Member since Dec 2009
7989 posts
Posted on 1/18/14 at 9:21 pm
Auburn fans have been blaming the shoe companies influence for about 10 years now and I never really bought in but I'm starting to reconsider. The 2 Under Armour schools in the conference are a combined 0-8 and clearly lacking talent. Frank Martin is a proven good coach and good recruiter. Barbee got A Moutrie and D Caracter to go to UTEP but can't anything near that level of big at Auburn. Maryland made something around 16 or 17 straight post seasons before they switched in 08 and outside of the 1st year haven't been back to the tourney since with 1 NIT appearance. There are other factors like lack of tradition and coaching changes but it has made me take a more serious look at the possibility. Thoughts?
This post was edited on 1/18/14 at 9:22 pm
Posted by The Nino
Member since Jan 2010
21527 posts
Posted on 1/18/14 at 9:23 pm to
No, it's the coaching
Posted by CrazyCadillac
Member since Oct 2011
1919 posts
Posted on 1/18/14 at 9:29 pm to
Gary Williams made the tourney in 09 and 10 then retired the next year. It's more the coaching. Even though I think USCe has a good coach, and will get it turned around.
This post was edited on 1/18/14 at 9:34 pm
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 1/18/14 at 9:32 pm to
you could put spring shoes on these squads and get the same results.
Posted by CayceCock13
Braves / Hornets / Rams Fan
Member since Oct 2012
17543 posts
Posted on 1/18/14 at 9:35 pm to
No, it's the lack of talent, experience, & coaching at times for us. I'm pleased so far with the season since the Hawaii trip. You can definitely tell this team in a few years will have a lot of potential, & they're at least competing in every game this season in the SEC minus UF.
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 1/18/14 at 9:57 pm to
They don't wear shoes in south carolina
Posted by jso0003
Member since Jun 2009
5170 posts
Posted on 1/18/14 at 10:00 pm to
I always hear this same reasoning from my friends who keep up with AU basketball, I'm interested to hear the USCe repsonse.

It seems to make sense to me.
Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
15740 posts
Posted on 1/18/14 at 10:00 pm to
Well USC is playing 7 freshmen and lost their best guard to an injury this week, so I think it's primarily that.

Underarmour does lag behind in their footwear compared to their competitors though. I have heard some football players complain about the underarmour cleats. But I don't think they would blame any losses on them
Posted by auisssa
Member since Feb 2010
4211 posts
Posted on 1/18/14 at 10:04 pm to
We'll give you Nikes and Anthony Grant.

Good luck.
Posted by ConwayGamecock
South Carolina
Member since Jan 2012
9121 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 4:17 am to
We just have undisciplined, young players right now....the talent level is getting better, and I like the direction we're going in in that regard. But even if we had flubber on our shoes, we wouldn't be very good right now....


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter