Started By
Message
what the frick ... who is calling plays
Posted on 10/12/13 at 8:45 pm
Posted on 10/12/13 at 8:45 pm
(no message)
2
Posted on 10/12/13 at 9:53 pm to darkhorse
what the F was that shitshow?
Posted on 10/12/13 at 10:03 pm to darkhorse
The shite play calling is a result of this dual QB bullshite. You can't effectively call plays while switching QBs in and out.
Posted on 10/12/13 at 10:11 pm to 17theBears
Defense is just horrible. Remember on this board I was calling for msu to hire their dc towards the end of the season.
Just not happy with a 1 point win.
Just not happy with a 1 point win.
Posted on 10/12/13 at 10:21 pm to darkhorse
quote:
Defense is just horrible.
Yep. Looked like shite tonight
quote:
Just not happy with a 1 point win.
Nobody is but Dan
Posted on 10/13/13 at 11:40 pm to 17theBears
quote:
Nobody is but Dan
I don't think he's "happy". Come on man.
Posted on 10/14/13 at 7:26 am to 17theBears
quote:
Just not happy with a 1 point win.
Nobody is but Dan
^^^^This because it is the only thing cooling that hot seat that after the bye will get much hotter.
Just not happy with a 1 point win.
Nobody is but Dan
^^^^This because it is the only thing cooling that hot seat that after the bye will get much hotter.
Posted on 10/14/13 at 7:32 am to bullpup01
quote:
This because it is the only thing cooling that hot seat that after the bye will get much hotter.
So you think we're going to lose to Kentucky?
Posted on 10/14/13 at 7:39 am to DynastyDawg
Uk has a shot at us if we see the same formula as the last 3 games.
But uk isnt what I am looking at. Its all other teams and not making a bowl.
But uk isnt what I am looking at. Its all other teams and not making a bowl.
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:03 am to darkhorse
quote:
Uk has a shot at us if we see the same formula as the last 3 games.
Last 3 games:
Troy: Great fricking formula
LSU: Great fricking formula through 3 Quarters
Bowling Green: Not giving a frick ? Bad formula
ETA:
We will play fine against better competition. This was one game. We will beat UK, Arkansas, possibly USCe, and maybe Ole Miss depending. There is a pretty good possibility we go bowling.
This post was edited on 10/14/13 at 8:06 am
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:30 am to DynastyDawg
If we play KY like we did BG, it is a possibility.
Posted on 10/14/13 at 9:34 am to DynastyDawg
Troy is troy. Not even going to debate that. Lets not try to put them on an sec level.
Lsu... no it wasnt. Lsu shut down Dak in the last part of the game. What we are doing is simply stupid. You have a passer on the bench who at this point is completing 70.7% of his passes. Who will run and be effective enough to boost the rushing attack.
Dak will not do well down the stretch because hes not efficient enough in passing. They will do exactly what auburn did, lsu did, and bowling green did. Stop Dak from running and let the chips fall where they may.
Lsu... no it wasnt. Lsu shut down Dak in the last part of the game. What we are doing is simply stupid. You have a passer on the bench who at this point is completing 70.7% of his passes. Who will run and be effective enough to boost the rushing attack.
Dak will not do well down the stretch because hes not efficient enough in passing. They will do exactly what auburn did, lsu did, and bowling green did. Stop Dak from running and let the chips fall where they may.
Posted on 10/14/13 at 11:04 am to bullpup01
quote:
If we play KY like we did BG, it is a possibility.
I am having a hard time understanding why no one sees that we were sleep walking through that game and from time to time even the Alabama's of the world do the same thing.
Posted on 10/14/13 at 11:07 am to darkhorse
quote:
Troy is troy. Not even going to debate that. Lets not try to put them on an sec level.
First, no one put them on an SEC level. You said is the formula working. The "formula" in the Troy game was fricking perfect. That has nothing to do with the opponent but rather what our gameplan is as a team.
quote:
Lsu... no it wasnt. Lsu shut down Dak in the last part of the game.
So you agree the "formula" through the first three quarters was good? Thought so.
quote:
You have a passer on the bench who at this point is completing 70.7% of his passes. Who will run and be effective enough to boost the rushing attack.
Dude, no. We need 2nd and 4-7 for our offense to be successful. How many times did Russell come in, sit back and take a 10 yard loss on a sack that completely shut down that drive for us? Don't worry I'll wait....
Posted on 10/14/13 at 12:23 pm to DynastyDawg
quote:
I am having a hard time understanding why no one sees that we were sleep walking through that game and from time to time even the Alabama's of the world do the same thing.
This- Plus we had 3 starters out to rest them and get them healthy.
Darkhorse can blah blah all he wants about completion percentages. Russell had the only 3 and out of the night to start the 2nd half- and completed 2/3 in that series. That 67% completion percentage didnt help him get a 1st down.
Dak had 5 possessions- 2 TD's, 1 FG attempt, Mullen inexplicably not kicking a FG inside the 10, and a turnover. Not a 3 and out all night.
Russell had 3 possessions- 1 TD and 2 punts. And Dak had to come in to get a 4th and 1 to help him on one of the drives- and he still couldnt get us in FG range.
Posted on 10/14/13 at 2:05 pm to DynastyDawg
quote:
So you agree the "formula" through the first three quarters was good? Thought so.
NO! I don't. At all.
quote:
How many times did Russell come in, sit back and take a 10 yard loss on a sack that completely shut down that drive for us? Don't worry I'll wait....
Let's put that in context. You tell me me what game you are talking about. Next, what is the difference in a drive being killed by a sack or a drive being killed by an incomplete pass or int? Or a Drive being killed by not rushing for the first down?
Posted on 10/14/13 at 2:13 pm to CoonassBulldog
quote:
Darkhorse can blah blah all he wants about completion percentages. Russell had the only 3 and out of the night to start the 2nd half- and completed 2/3 in that series. That 67% completion percentage didnt help him get a 1st down.
Wow.. So it does not count that Dak had a 3 and out that ended in an INT?? I see. Now I'm beginning to understand why you want Dak in there so much...
Let me guess.. You are going to suggest that you meant in the second half.
quote:
Dak had 5 possessions- 2 TD's, 1 FG attempt, Mullen inexplicably not kicking a FG inside the 10, and a turnover. Not a 3 and out all night.
There's my answer!!! LOL!!
quote:
Russell had 3 possessions- 1 TD and 2 punts. And Dak had to come in to get a 4th and 1 to help him on one of the drives
You are funny. Just too funny.
Posted on 10/14/13 at 2:13 pm to darkhorse
you just got owned again
Posted on 10/14/13 at 2:14 pm to Tds & Beer
quote:
you just got owned again
By what?? By Whom? Answer the question
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News