Started By
Message
re: Projected BCS Standings
Posted on 10/7/13 at 2:57 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Posted on 10/7/13 at 2:57 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
A&M is ranked 25th in the Colley below Houston, Florida, Washington, South Carolina, Louisville, Fresno State, Northern Illinois, Auburn, Virginia Tech, Baylor, Texas Tech, UCLA, Michigan, Miami, Missouri, and Oklahoma to name a few. A&M is ranked 26th in the Anderson-Hester below Louisville, Pittsburgh, Houston, Washington, Fresno State, Northern Illinois, Virginia Tech, Florida, South Carolina, Texas Tech, Auburn, Michigan, Baylor, Missouri, Miami, UCLA, and Oklahoma to name a few. A&M is ranked 21st in the Massey below Texas Tech, Washington, Northern Illinois, Virginia Tech, Florida, South Carolina, Texas Tech, Auburn, Michigan, Baylor, Missouri, Miami, UCLA, and Oklahoma to name a few. In the Sagarin, they're ranked 6th. In the Billingley, they're ranked 11th, behind Oklahoma (3), South Carolina (9), and Michigan (10)
Those mid 20 rankings are probably about right though considering A&M's schedule to this point. It will improve a little i presume.
2
Posted on 10/7/13 at 2:59 pm to bbap
Also, don't freak out about the computer rankings yet.
They are designed to work best with as many data points as possible.
Towards the end of the year they look pretty good, during the middle people freak out because they look so crazy.
But they need more data points to be more accurate.
They are designed to work best with as many data points as possible.
Towards the end of the year they look pretty good, during the middle people freak out because they look so crazy.
But they need more data points to be more accurate.
Posted on 10/7/13 at 5:00 pm to bbap
quote:
Those mid 20 rankings are probably about right though considering A&M's schedule to this point.
I'd put our strength of schedule far above
Houston
Louisville
Fresno State
Northern Illinois
Baylor
Texas Tech
Miami
and Missouri
so far
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News