Started By
Message
re: If SEC expands to 16 teams, what two teams would you pick?
Posted on 9/25/13 at 4:31 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Posted on 9/25/13 at 4:31 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
No one would choose to buy only the 5 channels they want a la carte when the whole cable package with 5,000 channels would be cheaper than the 5 a la carte channels.
2
Posted on 9/25/13 at 4:33 pm to MIZ_STL
quote:
But rest assured, if you want to pay for your cable channels individually, you will end up paying a ton more. A report from Needham Insights issued last month suggested that 20 million viewers would pay $30 a month for ESPN, which would give the network the $600 million a month it needs to keep functioning, because that's what it makes today. That's right: you currently pay only $6 a month for ESPN, because you and 100 million other people have the network, and they can afford to take comparatively little from you. Let's say that factor of five holds true across all the networks you watch: suddenly you're paying $6.06 for TNT ($1.21 a month) $4.10 for Fox News ($0.82), and so on down the line. In fact, if you factor in only the top 10 most highly-compensated networks (and ESPN is by far the highest, so they're all south of that $6 figure), you're up to $78 with only ten channels.
LINK
Posted on 9/25/13 at 4:34 pm to MIZ_STL
to anyone posted (almost) any ACC school they will not leave because Lacrosse. LAX is a money maker in this conference. SEC does not have it. Duke, UNC and UVA are always national contenders.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News