Started By
Message
re: PP7 still mad, pals. Oh he still real mad......
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:45 pm to Monticello
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:45 pm to Monticello
quote:Look, i dont really care, because we werent going to go down and score to win anyway. Bama was the better team. But if you dont think there was enough evidence to overturn the call for this play, then there is no use for replay.
I just love how everyone looks at pictures of PP7 clearly inbounds and thinks that proves something. The issue was not whether he was in bounds. The issue is if he was in bounds with complete control of the ball and if there was "indisputable video evidence" of that, since the call on the field was in incomplete pass.
1
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:54 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Look, i dont really care, because we werent going to go down and score to win anyway. Bama was the better team. But if you dont think there was enough evidence to overturn the call for this play, then there is no use for replay.
Yeah, the pictures don't prove anything. The SEC just coincidentally decided to invest millions in HD after it.
Probably wouldn't have affected the outcome. They whipped our arse starting the fourth quarter trailing.
This call was more clear than Reid's INT.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News