I'm intrigued on why you are so obsessed with "starts." Their OL (all except two) have significant experience. Shrugging that off is foolish. Combined, they have roughly 75 games worth of experience.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by Hardy_Har

Member since Nov 2012

16285 posts

Posted on 7/17/13 at 1:41 pm to joeyb147

His says "started" and your replies are "played in" come the frick on man..

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by CoonassBulldog

Member since Sep 2008

6913 posts

Posted on 7/17/13 at 1:42 pm to joeyb147

quote:
I'm intrigued on why you are so obsessed with "starts." Their OL (all except two) have significant experience. Shrugging that off is foolish. Combined, they have roughly 75 games worth of experience.

because starting means you played when the game was on the line...having just "played" means you could have played on the last series or two of a blowout.

Having starting experience on the OL is crucial- everyone knows that

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by engie

Member since Jan 2012

8953 posts

Posted on 7/17/13 at 2:43 pm to joeyb147

quote:
I'm intrigued on why you are so obsessed with "starts." Their OL (all except two) have significant experience. Shrugging that off is foolish. Combined, they have roughly 75 games worth of experience.

So, their starting OL has experience and should be fine, but our secondary doesn't and should get shredded?

Jamerson Love - 25 games played, Taveze Calhoun - 13 games played, Jay Hughes - 26 games played, and Nickoe Whitley - 36 games played. That's 100 games played in 4 of our likely starting 5 in nickel.

See the holes in the logic if you compare "apples to apples"?

1 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board