Started By
Message

re: Yeldon, Gurley, Hill, Cooper or JFF

Posted on 7/5/13 at 6:20 am to
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
82952 posts
Posted on 7/5/13 at 6:20 am to
quote:

JFF only looked good because outside of the aTm Oline, the rest of the team was shitty. A slump for him will be 8-4 season which is what aTm is headed for
this
Posted by Mirthomatic
Member since Feb 2013
4113 posts
Posted on 7/5/13 at 9:16 am to
quote:

JFF only looked good because outside of the aTm Oline, the rest of the team was shitty. A slump for him will be 8-4 season which is what aTm is headed for
this makes absolutely zero sense, and may actually be the dumbest thing I've read on this board


fify

#1 I assume the argument is that JFF only had the yards he did because, somehow, the rest of the offense couldn't get them? Ridiculous. He wasn't passing to himself. Evans and Swope were the most productive WR duo in the conference. Evans manhandled DBs, and everyone underestimated Swope's speed until he burned a 4.34 40 at the NFL combine.

#2 But maybe Johnny had all those rushing yards because the RBs sucked? Equally ridiculous. The top 3 RBs collectively averaged 5.5 yards per carry, and scored 25 TDs. Only Alabama and Georgia backs were better. The least productive member of A&M's rotation, Christine Michael, was drafted immediately after Eddie Lacy.

but most importantly:

#3 Anyone who watched JFF play and couldn't tell he was special just flat out knows nothing about football. Or is so hopelessly biased that the end result is effectively the same.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter