Started By
Message

re: Spinoff: Which SEC program is best built for long-term success in football?

Posted on 6/13/13 at 2:54 pm to
Posted by GeauxPack81
Member since Dec 2009
10485 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

KaiserSoze99
I can agree with you as well. It really depends how much stock you put into tradition. Personally, I don't think recruits will give a flying frick who won the 1958 NC 30 years from now. Tradition is something that people care about and use as a recruiting tool when they are winning, but when you are losing, people don't care about. The one team in the SEC thats even close to matching Bama's success over the course of history, is UT, and from the looks of recruiting rankings over the last 5 years, that "tradition" pitch ain't working out for them as well as people on this board would expect. That is why I put alot more emphasis on 1)recruiting base 2)competition for recruits. Luckily for Alabama, the state has some great athletes.


ETA: Oh, and frick A&M... can someone post the gif of the freak sitting on Manziel's face?
This post was edited on 6/13/13 at 2:56 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter