Started By
Message
re: Spinoff: Which SEC program is best built for long-term success in football?
Posted on 6/13/13 at 12:59 am to Tigerdew
Posted on 6/13/13 at 12:59 am to Tigerdew
Big Apple Tiger -Texas A&M is not Arkansas.
Arkansas is not or ever will be able to spend over $450 million for a football facilities upgrades project or turn out the NCAA's largest student section for games.
In two years Texas A&M's football facilities will be very clearly superior to yours. So keep digging.
Arkansas is not or ever will be able to spend over $450 million for a football facilities upgrades project or turn out the NCAA's largest student section for games.
In two years Texas A&M's football facilities will be very clearly superior to yours. So keep digging.
1
Posted on 6/13/13 at 2:35 am to Maroon Flash
Once a tacklebox..always a tacklebox..just now with brick exteriors and canopy up high to shield the shiny lures, cadets kissing cows, cannon, collie, and cheermoes in Pyle filling station attire.
Okay, it'll will be very nice, but at this point, it's semantics when LSU, Fla, Aub, Bama, Tenn, UGA, ATM, Ark argue stadiums, and will remain so, as the monster revenue checks and donor dollars are spent here forth in an already decades old SEC arms race.
Okay, it'll will be very nice, but at this point, it's semantics when LSU, Fla, Aub, Bama, Tenn, UGA, ATM, Ark argue stadiums, and will remain so, as the monster revenue checks and donor dollars are spent here forth in an already decades old SEC arms race.
This post was edited on 6/13/13 at 2:37 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News