Started By
Message
re: Texas A&M or LSU: Which Team Finishes Higher in the SEC West in 2013? (Article)
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:50 pm to Big Kat
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:50 pm to Big Kat
quote:
Well wtf does it matter how we get the yards as long as we get them?
I was limiting the conversation to RBs.
quote:
But our RBs are still deeper/better than yours.
I disagree because we have more experience at RB.
quote:
your D front 7 is better than ours.
Yes
quote:
It's ok to admit these things
I agree that you have higher recruited guys. But again, LSU has experience on their side on every level of the depth chart at RB.
JFF>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mett though
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:59 pm to cas4t
Wow, that escalated quickly... Methinks you are reading a little too much into it.
I actually wasn't making a comparison between A&M and LSU RBs. I was just comparing A&M's 2013 RBs to 2012.
I just think that A&M doesn't need JFF to be as dynamic as last year because we should be able to run the ball. JFF might get better at passing in the pocket, so if he is getting the ball out quicker, he might not be scrambling for as many yards and tds as last year. Stats are secondary to team success.
I actually wasn't making a comparison between A&M and LSU RBs. I was just comparing A&M's 2013 RBs to 2012.
I just think that A&M doesn't need JFF to be as dynamic as last year because we should be able to run the ball. JFF might get better at passing in the pocket, so if he is getting the ball out quicker, he might not be scrambling for as many yards and tds as last year. Stats are secondary to team success.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)