Started By
Message
re: 2012 revenues per USA Today
Posted on 5/7/13 at 11:03 pm to TheCheshireHog
Posted on 5/7/13 at 11:03 pm to TheCheshireHog
There are no way this is right. Mississippi State can not have more revenue than UM. We seat more and have much more concessions available so therefor I'd assume we sell more concessions. Those cow freakers dont spend any money at the game. This is wrong.
4
Posted on 5/7/13 at 11:07 pm to WAOMrebears
quote:
There are no way this is right. Mississippi State can not have more revenue than UM. We seat more and have much more concessions available so therefor I'd assume we sell more concessions. Those cow freakers dont spend any money at the game. This is wrong.
I assumed it was because Ole Miss only has like 6 alums and they earn about $40.00 a year... combined!
Posted on 5/7/13 at 11:39 pm to WAOMrebears
Stop altering
Posted on 5/8/13 at 8:11 am to WAOMrebears
quote:
here are no way this is right. Mississippi State can not have more revenue than UM. We seat more and have much more concessions available so therefor I'd assume we sell more concessions. Those cow freakers dont spend any money at the game. This is wrong.
What a little bitch
Posted on 5/8/13 at 11:25 am to WAOMrebears
quote:
There are no way this is right. Mississippi State can not have more revenue than UM. We seat more and have much more concessions available so therefor I'd assume we sell more concessions. Those cow freakers dont spend any money at the game. This is wrong.
That's BS, hell I've been to plenty of games at VHS and you drunkfricks never leave the Grove long enough to buy anything in the stadium.
Inventory losses are part of that equation.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News