Started By
Message
re: bama lost alot on both sides of the ball
Posted on 4/30/13 at 12:29 am to 167back
Posted on 4/30/13 at 12:29 am to 167back
quote:
65 catches 974 yds 7 TDs
Should read: 67 catches, 996 yards, 9 TDs
You conveniently left out White's 2 catches for 22 yards and Norwood's 2 TDs against Auburn.
quote:
Now tell me where those numbers make bama's WRs oh so better than what LSU returns?
That's easy: 9 TDs >>> 4 TDs, 995 yards > 974 yards
Congrats on being close (but still less than) on yards though.
1
Posted on 4/30/13 at 1:03 am to sarc
You got me there sac. Less than four more yards per game turned everything in bama's favor. I bow to greatness. They are the goat of sec/country WRs.
Quite honestly I just missed those two TDs. It wasn't on purpose.
Forgot about white being he was such a great contributor to that passing "O". That's how close the numbers were. It took a kid that had two catches for 22 yards to get the tide more receiving yards than LSU.
And from the start I never said LSU WRs were BETTER than bama's. What I said was they were right up there with them. Tigers had ten more receptions and 19 yards less in receiving over a six game 3.3ypg) stretch. If you don't think that's just about equal well......
Quite honestly I just missed those two TDs. It wasn't on purpose.
Forgot about white being he was such a great contributor to that passing "O". That's how close the numbers were. It took a kid that had two catches for 22 yards to get the tide more receiving yards than LSU.
And from the start I never said LSU WRs were BETTER than bama's. What I said was they were right up there with them. Tigers had ten more receptions and 19 yards less in receiving over a six game 3.3ypg) stretch. If you don't think that's just about equal well......
This post was edited on 4/30/13 at 1:09 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News