Started By
Message

re: bama lost alot on both sides of the ball

Posted on 4/29/13 at 5:16 pm to
Posted by 167back
Dos Gris
Member since Jun 2012
4714 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 5:16 pm to
Yo sacA. How bout this one?

Before going any farther the numbers you posted for common opponents are not quite the same as what I found.

Common five plus what we did heads up. I really think what we did against each other should count for something.

LSU
77 receptions 972 yards 4 TDs

bama
65 receptions 974 yards 7 TDs

In those SIX games LSU's top THREE receivers had MORE receptions for MORE yards and MORE TDs than any WR on the bama roster not named cooper.

LSU WR corps had better numbers as a whole VS three of the five common opponents and better heads up VS each other.

Posted by sarc
Member since Mar 2011
9997 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 5:39 pm to
You can choose whatever parameters you want. I chose common opponents because that's a commonly used metric. Common opponents plus head to head? Not so much

Also, not sure why you keep trying to compare top 3 WRs or compare a certain subset of LSUs WRs versus a certain subset of Bama's WRs other than to artificially create a comparison that is beneficial to LSU. We're comparing returning units and Coop, Bell, Norwood, Jones, and White are all returning WRs that will play a lot for Bama regardless of how few LSU chooses to use in its rotation.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter