Started By
Message
re: Realignment...B1G going after 2 more ACC schools?
Posted on 2/20/13 at 12:10 pm to aggressor
Posted on 2/20/13 at 12:10 pm to aggressor
I disagree. If the B1G takes UNC and UVA, that is a pretty solid move. Should the SEC sit around and let the ACC merge with the Big Twatever and cut the SEC out of those markets? If I'm the shot caller, I make a move for those two markets. Virginia and North Carolina coupled with the rest of the south and Texas, all other conferences will have to combine to overtake the SEC's footprint. I couldn't pass up that opportunity.
1
Posted on 2/20/13 at 12:16 pm to KaiserSoze99
I agree that if the B1G gets both UNC and UVA that will be a good move for the B1G and bad for the SEC. I'm not in favor of any expansion anywhere right now but I do hope if UNC and/or UVA is contemplating a move the SEC will at least say hi.
I'd be fine if the SEC ends up with UNC and VT or UNC and Duke. I don't give a damn about UVA and they don't give a damn about big time sports. I'll live with it if the SEC ends up with NC State and VT, but I'll consider that a bit of a loss for the SEC. So ideally, no more moves for a while, but if there are going to be moves, I'm hoping for UNC and Duke or UNC and VT.
I'd be fine if the SEC ends up with UNC and VT or UNC and Duke. I don't give a damn about UVA and they don't give a damn about big time sports. I'll live with it if the SEC ends up with NC State and VT, but I'll consider that a bit of a loss for the SEC. So ideally, no more moves for a while, but if there are going to be moves, I'm hoping for UNC and Duke or UNC and VT.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News