Started By
Message
re: Bama's "dynasty" was nearly a 10-3 team
Posted on 1/11/13 at 3:59 pm to graychef
Posted on 1/11/13 at 3:59 pm to graychef
quote:
You do realize that the 2012 and 2013 are not part of the rotating schedules. They are bridge schedules. I think there would be less complaining if the two years were part of the regular rotation.
They still tried to match according to teams that had gone the longest without playing each other, as the schedule allowed.
This post was edited on 1/11/13 at 4:02 pm
Posted on 1/11/13 at 4:37 pm to Bellabama
My original post should have ended all other posts after it. I am all knowing and offer sage insight into all things college football. The insolence on this board is becoming over the top. I believe I will request the congress to debate what to do with this board.
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)