Started By
Message

re: Bama's "dynasty" was nearly a 10-3 team

Posted on 1/11/13 at 2:33 pm to
Posted by tider04
North Carolina
Member since Oct 2007
5606 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

Not Bama. I know that. An undefeated rose bowl win is just that. Bama already has more title than anyone. Why claim bullshite titles. Hell if LSU claimed titles like bama( claim it if any poll had us #1) LSU has 8.

Come on man, really? Bama has 10 major poll titles, 4 Rose Bowl titles from back in the 20's and 30's(and btw, many schools claim these titles from this era) and one BS title in 1941 that we could easily replace with 1945, 1966 or 1977. Get over it already.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 2:36 pm to
It's insane to me that with all the talk of Bama's bullshite titles, no one mentions the fact that Bama doesn't claim 1966, which should 100% unquestionably belong to Bama
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter