Started By
Message
re: Does anyone deny Alabama is a dynasty?
Posted on 1/8/13 at 9:05 am to tiger1014
Posted on 1/8/13 at 9:05 am to tiger1014
Have to agree, the "dynasty" tag implies a certain level of total domination that the Tide hasn't quite managed (this coming from a fan of a team they've beaten by a combined score of 98-14 over the past two years).
That said, here's something to think about: since the beginning of the 2008 season, Bama has played 69 football games. They have taken the field with a legitimate shot at a BCS title in all but five of them (2009 Sugar Bowl vs Utah, and the last four games they played after the 2010 loss to LSU).
That's damned impressive.
That said, here's something to think about: since the beginning of the 2008 season, Bama has played 69 football games. They have taken the field with a legitimate shot at a BCS title in all but five of them (2009 Sugar Bowl vs Utah, and the last four games they played after the 2010 loss to LSU).
That's damned impressive.
This post was edited on 1/8/13 at 9:12 am
2
Posted on 1/8/13 at 9:13 am to FearlessFreep
You'd seriously have to be supremely butthurt to not view this program as a dynasty. I'm biased because of how much I've always liked them, but the crystal footballs speak for themselves.
Posted on 1/8/13 at 9:15 am to FearlessFreep
When you come away with the ultimate prize 3 of the last 4 years, you're a dynasty. What is it that people don't understand about this?
This post was edited on 1/8/13 at 9:17 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News