Started By
Message
re: The Kailo Thread
Posted on 12/7/12 at 4:13 pm to Whereisomaha
Posted on 12/7/12 at 4:13 pm to Whereisomaha
quote:
Who y'all would take in a heart beat and you know we have Conner as well. Out of your commits, who would we take with our last slots that we have offered? Kailo and that's it. And that's all we have lost to y'all H2H until Shumpert and Z.
Conner is the only take of the 3 at this point for us. Dodson was always a backup plan to Kailo/Shumpert. One that I honestly disagreed with(Kailo anyway).
This is so ridiculous. You wouldn't take Cox? He opened his recruitment to you too. Visited several times. You can't say "oh we didn't bother recruiting them very hard" just because they commit to us and/or started leaning heavily to us. That is pretty Yancy of you, as is your entire point of view in this thread.
3
Posted on 12/7/12 at 4:17 pm to engie
quote:
You can't say "oh we didn't bother recruiting them very hard" just because they commit to us and/or started leaning heavily to us.
Have you not read this thread?
Posted on 12/7/12 at 4:23 pm to engie
quote:
This is so ridiculous. You wouldn't take Cox? He opened his recruitment to you too. Visited several times. You
I thought about mentioning Cox. Yes he opened up his recruitment but I'm not sure we even got him on campus. You placed him there. If you want to count that as a H2H win then I understand, just giving my reason for not mentioning him. And before TD's says I conveniently didnt mention him, I didn't mention him because I wouldn't mention Lavon Hooks once he commits even though he's a 5 star because we placed him and you didn't have much or a shot
Posted on 12/7/12 at 4:32 pm to engie
quote:
You can't say "oh we didn't bother recruiting them very hard" just because they commit to us and/or started leaning heavily to us. That is pretty Yancy of you, as is your entire point of view in this thread.
I'm frickin sick of having to explain the same thing over and over again. If you disagree with something I say then quote it and explain why.
Once again for the 100th time...
It goes both ways. You didn't go after Davion because we locked him up. We didnt go after Jake because you locked him up.
We lost out on a lot of players to various schools. We have 9 slots left and we would choose to fill them with two commits (Kailo) who many feel is not yours, and Cox. You have two leans that we would make room in with Shump and Z. It you disagree with that then quote it and explain why. If you don't then stop bringing it up on every single page. I don't know how many times I have to explain it. This thread is retarded and yes because I keep posting novels, but what makes it retarded is its the name novels over and over. Please to Gpd explain why it's confusing
This post was edited on 12/7/12 at 4:34 pm
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News