Started By
Message
re: Does this guy have a perceived bias? Re: 2013 and 2012 Scheduling
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:23 pm to crimsonsaint
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:23 pm to crimsonsaint
Let's compare what Alabama's schedule would have been and what it was. We were supposed to play UT, Vandy, and UGA as our East opponents. Instead, we played aTm, UT, and Mizzou.
Our new schedule wasn't that much easier.
Our new schedule wasn't that much easier.
1
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:32 pm to pvilleguru
I think what everyone is upset about is that while you dropped UGA for Mizzou, we dropped UK for A&M. LSU was suppose to play At Lexington this year, and Bama at Athens. Expansion ended that.
Next year since the SEC office still can't decide on 8 or 9 games it's another bridged schedule.
Bama gets @UK and UT
LSU gets UF and @UGA
LSU has not been to Lexington since 07, but beat UGA in Athens in 09
Bama beat UK In Lexington in 09, but hasn't been to Athens since 08.
Your losses. I'm going to enjoy my trip to Athens
Next year since the SEC office still can't decide on 8 or 9 games it's another bridged schedule.
Bama gets @UK and UT
LSU gets UF and @UGA
LSU has not been to Lexington since 07, but beat UGA in Athens in 09
Bama beat UK In Lexington in 09, but hasn't been to Athens since 08.
Your losses. I'm going to enjoy my trip to Athens
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News