Started By
Message
re: Does this guy have a perceived bias? Re: 2013 and 2012 Scheduling
Posted on 12/3/12 at 11:10 am to RidiculousHype
Posted on 12/3/12 at 11:10 am to RidiculousHype
quote:
2011: Florida, Tennessee, Kentucky 2012: Florida, South Carolina (not in your question, but:) 2013: Florida, Georgia
and you played TN and vandy the year before that, and UGA and Vandy the year before that. So one could say Bama fans have every right to bitch about your previous schedules as well.
It's funny that yall bitch about the same schedule that you played in the very recent past
1
Posted on 12/3/12 at 11:16 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
and you played TN and vandy the year before that, and UGA and Vandy the year before that. So one could say Bama fans have every right to bitch about your previous schedules as well.
It's funny that yall bitch about the same schedule that you played in the very recent past
I don't think you understand, or maybe you are too dense to understand.
A rotating schedule is obviously defensible. You can't argue with it - some years will be easier for teams and that is just the way it shakes out. A custom-made "bridge" schedule is not. Next year is not the rotating schedule and so you defense of the schedule on that basis is completely null.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News