Started By
Message

re: Big 12/SEC Announcement coming today

Posted on 5/18/12 at 12:34 pm to
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36153 posts
Posted on 5/18/12 at 12:34 pm to
quote:


It sucks for the sugar bowl, but it's a strong move for the SEC and Big 12 to rival the Rose Bowl. Makes a lot of sense. It's a good power move IMO.



I kinda feel like the opposite. The Rose Bowl model has kinda faded from relevance.

People somehow think that the Rose Bowl:

1) has always only had big 10 vs pac teams (it hasn't)
2) still has traditional value if it includes runners up from those conferences (it doesn't)

If the SEC and Big 12 add to this silliness by also doing an automatic match-up the whole scene at the top of college football just gets even more messy and unwieldy

The proposed SEC/Big 12 game isn't a tradition yet and should be stopped before it further fouls up the flexibility of college football conferences. No matter what the outcome of that game unless you set up a multiple team playoff field before you start the playoff it just gets even more subjective and prone to manipulation.

If we want to use conference champs as the basis for a playoff then that's fine but it shouldn't be limited to just those four conferences when some years another conference rep will be better than some or all of those champs.

If we want to use a playoff model that doesn't use conference championships as your method for qualification then the whole thing is a distraction (neither the Rose nor the SEC/Big 12 matchup are logical as the first rounds in the playoff)
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36195 posts
Posted on 5/18/12 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

I kinda feel like the opposite. The Rose Bowl model has kinda faded from relevance.



Somewhat true, but Delany uses it as leverage when trying to set up the playoff system the way he wants. This gives Slive that same leverage. Smart move.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47966 posts
Posted on 5/19/12 at 7:03 am to
quote:

If we want to use conference champs as the basis for a playoff then that's fine but it shouldn't be limited to just those four conferences when some years another conference rep will be better than some or all of those champs.


maybe every team not SEC, BIG XII, PAC, B1G doesn't need to be D1, hmmmmm?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter