Started By
Message
re: I'm a bit unfamiliar with the SEC.
Posted on 5/8/12 at 12:51 pm to TeLeFaWx
Posted on 5/8/12 at 12:51 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
So what you're saying is this entire time that Auburn was claiming to be a nose ahead of UGA for number 3 in the SEC, in reality they have been closer to 6th or 7th? And the plot thickens.
Up until the late 1980's there was the big 4 that included Auburn. In 1992 it became the big 6 when LSU and UF were added. So as I said, if you want to limit the discussion to since 1975, it is best to use the big 6 then everyone else as a 2 tier grouping.
3
Posted on 5/8/12 at 12:54 pm to T Rey WI
quote:
Up until the late 1980's there was the big 4 that included Auburn.
In 1989 Auburn had 5 SEC championships and Ole Miss had 6, why weren't we in the big 4?
Posted on 5/8/12 at 12:55 pm to T Rey WI
quote:
Up until the late 1980's there was the big 4 that included Auburn. In 1992 it became the big 6 when LSU and UF were added. So as I said, if you want to limit the discussion to since 1975, it is best to use the big 6 then everyone else as a 2 tier grouping.
Interesting. It seems sort of sad that Aggie and yankee kitten are joining the party. Less matchups between the "Big 6". Granted 3 in each division is pretty cool, but the SEC needs to jump up to 9 conference games at some point. Or kick out Arky and Vandy at some point.
Posted on 5/8/12 at 12:56 pm to T Rey WI
quote:
Up until the late 1980's there was the big 4 that included Auburn. In 1992 it became the big 6 when LSU and UF were added.
That timeline doesn't make any sense to me. Obviously Florida was getting rolling on a tremendous streak with Spurrier... but LSU had fallen off from their earlier relevance into a horrible horrible mess during the early 90s
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News