Started By
Message

re: I'm a bit unfamiliar with the SEC.

Posted on 5/8/12 at 12:46 pm to
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29179 posts
Posted on 5/8/12 at 12:46 pm to
So what you're saying is this entire time that Auburn was claiming to be a nose ahead of UGA for number 3 in the SEC, in reality they have been closer to 6th or 7th?

And the plot thickens.
Posted by T Rey WI
Back in the south where I belong!
Member since Dec 2010
2937 posts
Posted on 5/8/12 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

So what you're saying is this entire time that Auburn was claiming to be a nose ahead of UGA for number 3 in the SEC, in reality they have been closer to 6th or 7th? And the plot thickens.


Up until the late 1980's there was the big 4 that included Auburn. In 1992 it became the big 6 when LSU and UF were added. So as I said, if you want to limit the discussion to since 1975, it is best to use the big 6 then everyone else as a 2 tier grouping.
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38034 posts
Posted on 5/8/12 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

So what you're saying is this entire time that Auburn was claiming to be a nose ahead of UGA for number 3 in the SEC






first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter