Started By
Message

re: Mizzou 87 Oklahoma 49 FINAL

Posted on 1/3/12 at 10:25 pm to
Posted by TigerMattSTL
O'Fallon, MO
Member since Aug 2011
1105 posts
Posted on 1/3/12 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

ironic he cites Anderson having success with Quinn's players (a couple players and 3 years later) but ignores that basically Mizzou's entire roster this season was recruited by Anderson.


I'm not ignoring that at all. I see a very small roster that is over achieving with great coaching. They had lousy coaching last year and ended the season in a 9-19 slump.

Haith came in and from day one said he'd end the opponent's layup drills against Missouri. He has done just that.

Players like Phil Pressey are talking about how much more comfortable they are. That Haith doesn't yank them after making a mistake, and how not having Anderson's crazy substitution patterns allows players to get into the flow of the game.
Posted by Boarford T Justice
I didn't agree, but taking one^^^^^
Member since Jan 2011
1830 posts
Posted on 1/3/12 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

Mizzou


It's more likely your program was holding Mike Anderson back. Did you ever think of that?

You hired Mike Anderson because his mentor, Nolan Richardson, owned Norm Stewart. Mike left to come home to Arkansas. Seems easy to understand to me.

Think about it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter