Started By
Message

re: S.O.S. and "Resumes" Are Complete BS

Posted on 12/7/11 at 8:15 pm to
Posted by Indfanfromcol
LSU
Member since Jan 2011
14740 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 8:15 pm to
But they wouldn't be in the talks of a championship game, just a bcs game which lays on the bcs system.
If we are talking about s.o.s not being the big factor, let me make an example. (sorry for making it resemble this year, but try not to put bama in your minds)
You have one team undefeated, they are going to the nc.

Now we have two more teams.
Team A. They went 11-1. In a hard conference too. The only lost came from the other team going to the NC, but they didn't win their conference.

Team B. They went 11-1. They are in a pretty good conference, but not like team A's. Their lost came from an average team, but they went to win their conference.

If we didn't use s.o.s as the main factor, you can throw out who each team lost too, and how hard their conference is because that all is a part of s.o.s. So what does that leave you to judge with? Just who won their conference.

I like s.o.s. Its what put bama in the nc.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83676 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 8:30 pm to
I understand what you're saying. But to go against what you asked me to do 6-6 isn't avg. That sucks. And the big thing we disagree on is the CCG. I put ZERO credit in winning a conference without winning a CCG.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter