Started By
Message

Is Petrino that good or is Rivals that Worthless?
Posted on 11/21/11 at 2:08 pm
Posted on 11/21/11 at 2:08 pm
It seems like the pigs have been pretty damn good the last 3 years. They really haven't gotten a lot of "highly recruited" players.
I know that the services miss on individual players (Mo Claiborne, Tyrann, Will Blackwell), but on the whole, it seems like the teams that get the highest recruiting rankings are typically the most competitive.
This year tFlagship is ranked #25 in Rivals. They were #24 last year, and #49 in 2010. Is Petrino doing more with less, Arky talent undervalued, or both?
I know that the services miss on individual players (Mo Claiborne, Tyrann, Will Blackwell), but on the whole, it seems like the teams that get the highest recruiting rankings are typically the most competitive.
This year tFlagship is ranked #25 in Rivals. They were #24 last year, and #49 in 2010. Is Petrino doing more with less, Arky talent undervalued, or both?
Posted on 11/21/11 at 2:09 pm to ThugginItandLovinIt
Its impossible to rank high school players except for a few of them. imo
ETA: in other words, *'s dont fricking matter.
ETA: in other words, *'s dont fricking matter.
This post was edited on 11/21/11 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 11/21/11 at 2:09 pm to ThugginItandLovinIt
Petrino is that good, and our recruits are undervalued.
Gonna be sick since he's about to start pulling in top tier players the next couple years
Gonna be sick since he's about to start pulling in top tier players the next couple years
Posted on 11/21/11 at 2:10 pm to ThugginItandLovinIt
Arkansas will never be a top 10 recruiting team, don't have the instate talent or national name to do that. Maybe if we go on a roll and win some SEC or NC's but not until then. While I'm sure he'd prefer the freakish highly rated recruits, he finds guys that fits his system and has continually said he looks for smart football players with good measurables, he feels he can mold them once they get on campus. So far, he's done that.
This post was edited on 11/21/11 at 2:11 pm
Posted on 11/21/11 at 2:11 pm to ThugginItandLovinIt
For starters, Rivals is pretty shitty now. At the beginning of the season they didn't even have an analyst that covers our state ir Oklahoma. Two of our biggest recruiting grounds. 
This post was edited on 11/21/11 at 2:12 pm
Posted on 11/21/11 at 2:12 pm to Hubbhogg
quote:
Gonna be sick since he's about to start pulling in top tier players the next couple years
From where? Missouri? Texas belongs to UT, LSU has Lousiana, Alabama and Georgia forget about it. but you could poach Mississippi!
Posted on 11/21/11 at 2:12 pm to Latarian
We've already got top talent visiting, we've just got to start locking them down. Nutt couldn't even get them to visit.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 2:13 pm to Analyze That
quote:
From where? Missouri? Texas belongs to UT, LSU has Lousiana, Alabama and Georgia forget about it. but you could poach Mississippi!
Arkansas has Arkansas QB's and WR's
This post was edited on 11/21/11 at 2:14 pm
Posted on 11/21/11 at 2:14 pm to Analyze That
A lot of kids don't really get evaluated that much it seems. It's nearly impossible to keep track of the thousands of good kids that play HS ball every year. A lot of kids don't get evaluated til late in the season (e.g. Brandon Allen and he got his 4 stars pretty late). I think the best thing to look at is offer list and measurables (though often those measurables are exaggerated in one way or the other).
This post was edited on 11/21/11 at 2:15 pm
Posted on 11/21/11 at 2:14 pm to TheCheshireHog
I think I would take Petrino's evals of QBs and WRs over anyone. Dude never misses, even at Louisville, and even if they actually suck like Brohm, he makes them look really good. If Arky can recruit better OL and Defensive players (exempting Bequette) and keep taking all-world 5.7 WRs, they could win a title when LSU loses everyone the year after next.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 2:15 pm to Analyze That
quote:
From where? Missouri? Texas belongs to UT, LSU has Lousiana, Alabama and Georgia forget about it. but you could poach Mississippi!
We've had 4-5 stars from all over, Chicago, CO, AZ, CA, FL, VA, TX, MS etc. etc.
Fulmer was on a local talk show here last week and he compared our situation to theirs in the late 90s of recruiting nationally.
It is what it is. We have to do this, and with Petrino we can better than ever. Being #3 in the nation obviously is helping
Posted on 11/21/11 at 2:16 pm to 870Hog
Are you talking about the same rivals that had a guy leave to a competiter and admitted on the way out that rivals caters to there bigger fan bases?? Dude admitted on radio they gave Alabama players higher rankings because their mod threatened to leave rivals if the didnt. IF that dont say it all I dont know what does. Plus Petrino is a great coach.
Posted on 11/21/11 at 2:20 pm to ThugginItandLovinIt
quote:
I think I would take Petrino's evals of QBs and WRs over anyone.
I think the recruiting services are starting to catch on here.
We signed a QB last year, whom everyone in Arkansas said was legit, but Rivals only had him rated as a low 3* in the early rankings. They finally came out and evaluated him at the end of the year and the next day immediately bumped him to a 4* and their #5 overall pro style QB.
Same thing happened this year with a WR we have committed out of OK. The kid had zero offers but came to our summer camp and dominated. The coaches offered him immediately. ESPN and 247 both finally saw tape on him recently and bumped him from low rankings to 4*'s.
This post was edited on 11/21/11 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 11/21/11 at 2:23 pm to TheCheshireHog
Lets go with Trey Flowers for one example. Auburn/Bama don't offer so he can't be that good right. He's played all year as a true frosh and was only a 3*
It's a joke
It's a joke
Posted on 11/21/11 at 2:30 pm to ThugginItandLovinIt
quote:
Is Petrino doing more with less, Arky talent undervalued, or both?
Some of both, but the key is Petrino's evaluation of talent. Doesn't just look at the measurables of ht, wt, 40 time, etc. He places a lot of stock in the overall HS program they come from. How have they been taught to work out, practice, execute assignments? Have they been held accountable by their coaches? Are they coachable? All of that factors in, and could lead to his passing on a 4 or 5 star guy, in favor of someone without quite as much acclaim.
He's a great evaluator of - not just raw talent, but of who will actually be successful at the college level in his system. And obviously, once he gets them on campus, he knows how to get the most out of them.
Popular
Back to top
5







