Started By
Message
4
Posted on 11/6/11 at 11:14 am to Tigerbait337
quote:EXACTLY. Not enough evidence to overturn EITHER call.
Interception..BUT:
If the refs call that a catch on the field, they wouldn't overturn it to an INT. That's how bang-bang that play was.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 11:15 am to Tigerbait337
I think as a fan base Bama should claim that as the call where the refs fricked us and cry about it for years.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 11:17 am to Tigerbait337
quote:
If the refs call that a catch on the field, they wouldn't overturn it to an INT. That's how bang-bang that play was.
Disagree. Why was the call "confirmed"? It was clear Williams lost control of the ball before being "down", which means simultaneous possession couldn't apply. Eric Reid won the battle for the ball. It's as simple as that, and it should have been overturned if it would have been ruled a catch.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 12:14 pm to Tigerbait337
quote:
Interception..BUT:
If the refs call that a catch on the field, they wouldn't overturn it to an INT. That's how bang-bang that play was
agreed!
had the ball been thrown correctly this conversation would never happen!
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News