Started By
Message

re: More Butt Hurt - Reworking the BCS

Posted on 1/12/11 at 3:29 pm to
Posted by superman
Member since Mar 2008
8079 posts
Posted on 1/12/11 at 3:29 pm to
I didn't read the article, but I don't like it.

If they did it based on APR, it would benefit some teams in the SEC (Florida, Bama, Vandy) and severely hurt others (LSU, Auburn.
Posted by Thracken13
Aft Cargo Hold of Serenity
Member since Feb 2010
16124 posts
Posted on 1/12/11 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

I didn't read the article, but I don't like it.

If they did it based on APR, it would benefit some teams in the SEC (Florida, Bama, Vandy) and severely hurt others (LSU, Auburn.


couldn't agree more.

although, one plus side is it would force a more level education across the board - but it would be terribly detailed and intricate. interesting, but not terribly feasable to develop and implement.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 1/12/11 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

If they did it based on APR, it would benefit some teams in the SEC (Florida, Bama, Vandy) and severely hurt others (LSU, Auburn.

According to this website, LSU's APR (965) is higher than Alabama's (957):

LINK
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter