What I said has nothing to do with the kids. Let's drop that part of the conversation until we tackle the part I was talking about. Hold the thought, because we can go back and deal with it afterward.

We were making the comparison between the fathers; Cecil and Ingram Sr.

I simply pointed out that Ingram Sr. didn't go to prison because of anything he did to his son.

Cecil, on the other hand, did just about everything he could to frick his own flesh and blood's future up out of nothing more than simple avarice. Now, you guys claim to love Cam so much. That being said, how can you defend Cecil in light of what has come out?

In closing, I'll reiterate. Ingram Sr. got in trouble with the law because he fricked himself over. He got time tacked on beacuse he wanted to go see his boy play in a game and missed his report-in date to go to jail.

Cecil, on the other hand, has had his access to Auburn limited because he tried to parlay his son into money, the consequences to said son be damned. That is fricking reprehensible.

As far as whether sins of the father should follow the children, of course I don't think that. I've never claimed that they should. If anything, Auburn should've declared him ineligible as soon as the possibility that Cecil might have shopped him around became evident and then immediately appealed it. Cam, as a person, does not deserve to be dragged through all this shite.

Now that we've elevated the discourse from mudslinging and are trying to move on to honest, enlightened conversation, I'll gladly hear what you have to say.