Started By
Message

re: Why would MSU not tell SEC about telephone conversations...

Posted on 11/11/10 at 12:56 pm to
Posted by LSUMafia
Member since May 2005
9862 posts
Posted on 11/11/10 at 12:56 pm to
Why is it hard to understand that there are several logical reasonings for this including that SEC is corrupt as hell.

1) The SEC is corrupt, and anyone thinking any differently is kidding themselves. They are not going to allow a program like Auburn to go down if they can help it seeing Auburn's history as cheaters would net them huge sanctions.

2) MSU didn't have knowledge of the recorded voicemails/tapes that could later corroborate those conversations that the recruiters/coaches are claiming to have had. Thus, it would be putting hearsay in the reports. Now those are being found to exist, and they are comfortable coming out with that information. That's not a stretch seeing as the Newton's seem like they'd be stupid enough to call random boosters trying to grease their palms and even stupider to leave a voicemail.

3) We have no official statement from the SEC on these things. This is all based on a random report claiming an SEC spokesman claimed this, yet he is never quoted which I find hilarious. Auburn fans are clinging on to a paraphrase of what spokesman supposedly said to attack MSU.

People also choose to ignore the realistic fact that MSU gave the information at hand to the SEC initially and continued their investigations over the next several months. They wanted to get all their ducks in a row on the Camgate stuff before giving the reports/info to the corrupt SEC.
This post was edited on 11/11/10 at 1:06 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter