Started By
Message
re: NCAA Ruling
Posted on 9/8/10 at 5:13 pm to XbengalTiger
Posted on 9/8/10 at 5:13 pm to XbengalTiger
quote:
Look, I got no dog in this fight but these players should have gotten the same punishment rather it be 2 games or 4. Giving a player a lesser punishment for accepting more gifts rather it be cash or merchandise seems wrong and grounds for appeal.
One sold something, which was unquestionably against the rules. The other accepted what he thought was legal and found out otherwise. Cooperation probably had something to do with it also. Seeing as nobody here knows what happened in both cases, 100%, it's ludicrous to think one is worse than the other when the penalizing institution says otherwise.
0
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News