The sec doesn't need to add anyone. Wh fix something that isn't broken? We got our multi-billion tv deal already, so there is no need for expansion. Y'all do realize that this is the only reason anyone wants to expand? Honestly, we'd still be the strongest conference even if the PAC 10 were to go to 16 teams. 16 teams is way too many and makes being in a conference almost pointless

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by BayouBengals18

Fort Worth

Member since Jan 2009

9843 posts

Posted on 6/9/10 at 9:41 am to lsufball19

To make it easy on the BCS officials. They want to make more money doing the +1 "playoff" format, and with all the major schools put into 4 conferences, it makes their job alot easier. 4 champions play semifinal games, I guess you could rotate year by year who plays who, and winners make the NC.

I agree Chico. I think we should add 2 schools based on athletic program, and 2 schools with good academics(one of each in each division). And I'm not saying add Yale or Harvard, more along the lines of Baylor, an NC or Duke would be nice but I doubt it.

This post was edited on 6/9/10 at 9:47 am

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by SuperD AP

Member since Feb 2008

1179 posts

Posted on 6/9/10 at 9:54 am to lsufball19

quote:
SEC Expansion Wishes
The sec doesn't need to add anyone. Wh fix something that isn't broken? We got our multi-billion tv deal already, so there is no need for expansion. Y'all do realize that this is the only reason anyone wants to expand? Honestly, we'd still be the strongest conference even if the PAC 10 were to go to 16 teams. 16 teams is way too many and makes being in a conference almost pointless

I agree. Instead of expanding, just play some of these pussies that are trying to expand in our ooc games. Its the same teams the SEC has been beating in the NC game, they are just joining together.

If we do expand though... I would like

East
Fla. St.
Miami

West
OU
OSU

0 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board