If that is all you can say that pretty much sums up the fact that you can deny what I just said. Give me the football reasons why Hill would be better served to go with lsu. Good luck

This post was edited on 2/20/10 at 4:35 pm

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by SEC Ranter

Member since Oct 2009

1348 posts

Posted on 2/20/10 at 4:38 pm to SEC Ranter

I can list a variety of football reasons why he would be better served to go with Alabama.

1. The offensive style and philosophy better fit his position and strengths.

2. Alabama just produced a Heisman winner at his position.

3. Alabama is a more stable program (just won a national championship while lsu is anything but stable)

4. Alabama has a better coach (this is important if he wants to win a lot of games while he is in school)

This post was edited on 2/20/10 at 4:42 pm

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by memphisplaya

Member since Jan 2009

85894 posts

Posted on 2/20/10 at 4:41 pm to SEC Ranter

well pretty simple... We have a pretty good history of putting backs in the NFL... they may not win a Heisman(Paying refs much for no holding calls) But they put up impressive numbers. Laster year was our worst rushing year since 99 and don't expect that again... BR is his home he wants to bring LSU back to prominence and he can't do that at Bama, and how do you know he isn't there recruiting for LSU?