Started By
Message
re: Eric Berry shouldn't be 1st Team All-SEC
Posted on 11/20/09 at 12:36 pm to woopiginaustin
Posted on 11/20/09 at 12:36 pm to woopiginaustin
quote:
Help me understand the difference between Eric Berry getting the nod, and Mallett not.
If it isn't stats, then only teams with 10-12 wins should have candidates, right?
If Tebow earns the nod for his teams record, then why should Eric Berry receive the honor?
You don't get it and you choose to NEVER get it......so why should I waste my time?
You've convinced yourself that there is a conspiracy and nothing that I or anyone else will say can convince you otherwise.
2
Posted on 11/20/09 at 12:38 pm to pankReb
too bad Arkansas wont have Mallett next year 
Posted on 11/20/09 at 12:39 pm to pankReb
quote:
pank
Hold up.
It's YOU that will not present a logical case.
I have shown that Mallett has superior numbers, and an instance (Eric Berry) where record makes no difference.
So, please, tell me why YOU think Tebow should earn it. Because of Florida's record? If so, why shouldn't a Florida or Bama defensive player fill Berry's slot as well?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News