Started By
Message
re: Eric Berry shouldn't be 1st Team All-SEC
Posted on 11/20/09 at 12:33 pm to pankReb
Posted on 11/20/09 at 12:33 pm to pankReb
Ok, Pank.
Help me understand the difference between Eric Berry getting the nod, and Mallett not.
If it isn't stats, then only teams with 10-12 wins should have candidates, right?
If Tebow earns the nod for his teams record, then why should Eric Berry receive the honor?
Help me understand the difference between Eric Berry getting the nod, and Mallett not.
If it isn't stats, then only teams with 10-12 wins should have candidates, right?
If Tebow earns the nod for his teams record, then why should Eric Berry receive the honor?
2
Posted on 11/20/09 at 12:36 pm to woopiginaustin
quote:
Help me understand the difference between Eric Berry getting the nod, and Mallett not.
If it isn't stats, then only teams with 10-12 wins should have candidates, right?
If Tebow earns the nod for his teams record, then why should Eric Berry receive the honor?
You don't get it and you choose to NEVER get it......so why should I waste my time?
You've convinced yourself that there is a conspiracy and nothing that I or anyone else will say can convince you otherwise.
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:51 pm to woopiginaustin
quote:
Help me understand the difference between Eric Berry getting the nod, and Mallett not.
It's very simple. It's based on the concensus opinion that Berry is the best at his position in the SEC and the fact that Tebow is the best at his position.
It's not solely on stats. It's not solely on record. You've incorrectly come to that conclusion.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News