Started By
Message
re: Eric Berry shouldn't be 1st Team All-SEC
Posted on 11/20/09 at 12:31 pm to woopiginaustin
Posted on 11/20/09 at 12:31 pm to woopiginaustin
quote:
Based on his numbers being inferior to Mallett's this year or records?
Which is it?
Should Tebow get it for having the 2nd best numbers, or his teams record?
If it's his teams record, then only Florida and Alabama should have 1st Team honors. Eric Berry is what? 2nd team? 3rd team?
It's because there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING that states the 1st team ALL-SEC is determined solely off of stats.
But you likely aren't going to read the above.......seeing as how you already are committed to believing the consipiracy.
1
Posted on 11/20/09 at 12:33 pm to pankReb
Ok, Pank.
Help me understand the difference between Eric Berry getting the nod, and Mallett not.
If it isn't stats, then only teams with 10-12 wins should have candidates, right?
If Tebow earns the nod for his teams record, then why should Eric Berry receive the honor?
Help me understand the difference between Eric Berry getting the nod, and Mallett not.
If it isn't stats, then only teams with 10-12 wins should have candidates, right?
If Tebow earns the nod for his teams record, then why should Eric Berry receive the honor?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News