Started By
Message

re: Eric Berry shouldn't be 1st Team All-SEC

Posted on 11/20/09 at 12:29 pm to
Posted by woopiginaustin
Moderator
Member since Jun 2008
8590 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Because they all agree that Tebow deserves 1st team All-SEC


Based on his numbers being inferior to Mallett's this year or records?

Which is it?

Should Tebow get it for having the 2nd best numbers, or his teams record?

If it's his teams record, then only Florida and Alabama should have 1st Team honors. Eric Berry is what? 2nd team? 3rd team?
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64695 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

Based on his numbers being inferior to Mallett's this year or records?

Which is it?

Should Tebow get it for having the 2nd best numbers, or his teams record?

If it's his teams record, then only Florida and Alabama should have 1st Team honors. Eric Berry is what? 2nd team? 3rd team?


It's because there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING that states the 1st team ALL-SEC is determined solely off of stats.


But you likely aren't going to read the above.......seeing as how you already are committed to believing the consipiracy.
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
59612 posts
Posted on 11/20/09 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Based on his numbers being inferior to Mallett's this year or records?

Is Tebow's rushing numbers inferior? Maybe it's based on his ability to run & throw. He's a big of threat running as throwing and yet defenses still haven't stopped him or his team yet.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter