Started By
Message

re: Freshman running backs

Posted on 9/24/09 at 1:22 pm to
Posted by Chimlim
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2005
17716 posts
Posted on 9/24/09 at 1:22 pm to
I've come to realize that Bama fans are very hard to talk with rationally about football. You're comparing a RB who has played to a RB who hasn't played yet. Yes, I know Richardson is also behind Upchurch and Ingram like Ford is behind Scott and Williams. But are you an idiot? LSU's OLine has been terrible so far this year, why would you put a true freshman in when they can't even block good enough for Scott?

If anything your stupid argument proves that right now....Bama's OL > LSU OL
This post was edited on 9/24/09 at 1:25 pm
Posted by LSUownsSEC
OutOfTheArea
Member since May 2008
3178 posts
Posted on 9/24/09 at 1:26 pm to
I've come to realize that Bama fans are very hard to talk with rationally about football. You're comparing a RB who has played to a RB who hasn't played yet. Yes, I know Richardson is also behind Upchurch and Ingram like Ford is behind Scott and Williams. But are you an idiot? LSU's OLine has been terrible so far this year, why would you put a true freshman in when they can't even block good enough for Scott?
_________________________________________________
What's with all of this?
LINK
Posted by TideSaint
Hill Country
Member since Sep 2008
75980 posts
Posted on 9/24/09 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

why would you put a true freshman in


Tennessee has had fairly decent success with a true freshman RB running behind a terrible O-Line. What it all comes down to is your freshman RB isn't as good as Bama's or UT's. Not saying he is a bad player, just not as good as those two.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter