Started By
Message

re: "Vacated" wins do not equate to losses...

Posted on 6/11/09 at 10:03 am to
Posted by BamaJD88
Mobile, Alabama
Member since Jan 2007
718 posts
Posted on 6/11/09 at 10:03 am to
quote:

So does this include the 2007 Bama-OM game that is still in progress with OM having the ball on the 2 with 7 seconds left on the clock?



just asking?


Good question, I don't know the answer to that. But I think that game may be included.
Posted by BamaJD88
Mobile, Alabama
Member since Jan 2007
718 posts
Posted on 6/11/09 at 10:05 am to
Shula was 6-7 in 2007. I think most, if not all, of those 6 wins may be vacated. I say that because I think that's about the time that some of the football players got books.
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64805 posts
Posted on 6/11/09 at 10:08 am to
quote:

Good question, I don't know the answer to that. But I think that game may be included.


doesn't matter, just screwing with you guys.

Vacated wins mean absolutely jack in the grand scheme of things.

That's what pisses me off about the NCAA, OM had a dumbass HC who ran off half the team during his tenure, he's gone and now we lose 3 schollies....Bama athletes massively abuse their scholarship benefits and they get a slap on the wrist.

the NCAA needs to be carpet bombed. Most totally inept group in America.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter