Started By
Message
CFP games are shameful so far but…
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:07 pm
There were games in the past that were the same way. I would hope and expect the following games to be more competitive but there are no guarantees.
We will know more at the end of the day and I’d expect the next round to be better.
We will know more at the end of the day and I’d expect the next round to be better.
4
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:09 pm to Bbobalou
We are two years removed from a 60 point game in the national championship. It happens.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:09 pm to Bbobalou
The beauty of CFP is that it isn’t professional sports.
They are trying to make it something it isn’t.
CFP is about a couple of teams rising to the cream of the crop and facing off in a BCS title game. Not a bunch of paid assassins changing teams every year.
They are trying to make it something it isn’t.
CFP is about a couple of teams rising to the cream of the crop and facing off in a BCS title game. Not a bunch of paid assassins changing teams every year.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:10 pm to anc
quote:
We are two years removed from a 60 point game in the national championship. It happens.
But it’s the same thing only expanded to include more teams.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:11 pm to Bbobalou
If we actually wanted better games, we'd have the lower seed host.
They're the lower seed for a reason. If you want the game closer you'd give them home field. If you want the team who was better during the season to have home field... they're going to run the lower seed out of town a lot.
They're the lower seed for a reason. If you want the game closer you'd give them home field. If you want the team who was better during the season to have home field... they're going to run the lower seed out of town a lot.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:12 pm to DawginSC
quote:
we actually wanted better games, we'd have the lower seed host.
They're the lower seed for a reason. If you want the game closer you'd give them home field.
Honestly, one of the dumbest things I've ever heard.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:14 pm to DawginSC
quote:
If we actually wanted better games, we'd have the lower seed host.
That would be a better option to have the games be competitive. At least in theory. I understand that they’re wanting to award the better team but at the same time you get these types of games.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 1:20 pm to Marktastic86
quote:
Honestly, one of the dumbest things I've ever heard.
I'm not saying we should do that.
The point of the seeds and home field isn't to create good games. It's to reward the better teams.
Both of the playoff games so far would have been closer if the losing team had home field. We don't WANT them to be closer. We want the teams who did better during the season to have an easier time.
Posted on 12/21/24 at 4:57 pm to Bbobalou
I think we all get why the setup is the way it is. With that being said people complaining about the competitiveness of the games should understand that.
However we are seeing topic after topic about the games aren’t competitive. Regardless of the sport some teams get in when people feel that someone else should.
If a team wins their conference championship they get in. Even if they have a losing record. Basketball does it and I think baseball does it also.
When it’s all said and done it should be the top 4 seeded teams will be playing at the end of the end.
However we are seeing topic after topic about the games aren’t competitive. Regardless of the sport some teams get in when people feel that someone else should.
If a team wins their conference championship they get in. Even if they have a losing record. Basketball does it and I think baseball does it also.
When it’s all said and done it should be the top 4 seeded teams will be playing at the end of the end.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News