Brock Bowers does the Trump Dance after scoring TD

More research shows it was indeed legit, Bowers commented on it and the Raiders and CBS are big mad.


Fox News link.
LINK

quote:

---

I think Trump won much bigger than what the "official" results show. I think they tried to steal it again but it was too big to steal. I think this was more like a Nixon landslide, or a 1984 Reagan if you take out the inner city cheating.

---

That's the thing about a really polarizing politician. People who see that politician as one of the greatest things ever have a hard time processing why anybody else wouldn't think he was one of the greatest things ever. People who really like that politican have a blind spot and think that the only reason more people wouldn't think he was the greatest thing ever was because of cheating and something nefarious.

In turn, people who can't stand the guy have a hard time processing how anyone could ever support the guy or how the hell they could ever vote for him.

It shouldn't have cost Republicans nearly as much time and money to win as it did. It's been a predicatble global wide trend. Above all else, people vote with their wallets. Incumbents who were in charge during rapid inflation back in 2021 and 2022 have all been voted out. It was inevitable Republicans would win, but it shouldn't have been this close. The GOP could've run a half dozen different normal-acting candidates and won by more. Trump was a weak candidate.

Nate Silver is that gay lib pollster with models that get falsified every election. Nov. 5th was actually very embarrassing for him.

A veneer of objectivity and expertise, but he's just as clueless as the rest of them.

quote:

---

That's a very telling graph on Harris. She was very very unfavorable, until suddenly the dems made her the nominee, then an instant swing! Very artificial.

This was a landslide for Trump even bigger than what the election shows.

I know you hate it, and that's ok.

---

So Nate Silver was ready to risk it all – reputation, business, etc. – by secretly giving Kamala Harris an instant swing on his website without anybody knowing, all because Nate Silver knows that there's a huge plot to have the election fixed, and Nate Silver secretly part of this shadow group.

Might be find to find a home, Grandpa.

First, you don't show the source of the graph/data that you posted but it looks like the source might have been Real Clear Politics.
Here's a link to the Real Clear Politics data: Real Clear Politics

2. It doesn't make sense that Trump was less favorable that Kamala Harris since Trump won the popular vote in unprecedented fashion unless the polled data was not representative of the voting population and if that's the case then the data is worthless as a political election argument.

3. The source data for the Real Clear Politics graph (and likely what you posted also) is biased because the polls were from known liberal progressive Democrat biased news sources with the possible exceptions of Fox News and the New York Post. You can never forget that Democrats control the vast majority of main stream media.

Here are those sources:

Economist/YouGov
Ipsos
New York Post
NPR/PBS/Marist
Forbes/HarrisX
NBC News
Emerson
Yahoo News
Morning Consult
NY Times/Siena
CNN
Wall Street Journal
Gallup
CNBC
USA Today/Suffolk
Atlas Intel
TIPP
FOX News
Harvard-Harris

4. And while Republicans might have won with an alternative candidate, no candidate has Trump's passion and energy for fixing our flawed government and biased media, institutions of higher learning and tech companies all of which suppress any and all political opposition.
And the truth is, Democrats have transformed the political landscape to the extent that they are using government agencies and any means at their disposal to eliminate their political opponents.
And yes that includes an assassination attempt of Trump.
The so called incompetence of the Secret Services wasn't in fact incompetence but orchestrated reduced security which allowed the would be assassin, Thomas Crooks, to get off 8 shots at Trump.

quote:

---

I'm not implicating nate silver. I'm saying democrats who didn't give a shite about Kamala and didn't particularly like her, on a very constant trend on that graph, all suddenly changed their minds about her when it was announced she'd be the nominee.

---

The same shite happened with Trump in '16. Most GOP primary voters thought he was an absolute joke. Out of nowhere, he got some momentum and now has ~80%+ cultish support from the GOP.

When a party chooses their nominee for POTUS, yeah, that person usually receives higher favorability marks from their constituency.