Started By
Message

re: Will Wade > Matt McMahon

Posted on 3/20/24 at 9:30 am to
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
9198 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 9:30 am to
quote:

Had the LSU Athletic administration waited just a ---- hair longer, they would not have had to let him go prematurely, and WW would still be in Baton Rouge. If Wade and LSU would have gotten in trouble - then WHYYYYYYYYYY is Wade coaching again ??????


All True.

quote:

That being said, what McMahon has done is truly remarkable.


Remarkable is an EXTREME overstatement. McMahon seems like a great guy but losing in the first round of the NIT is not remarkable. Its definitely a huge improvement over year 1 but its still below the expectations that Will Wade set at LSU. And don't give me any BS about what he inherited from Wade. That excuse is fine for year 1 but with the transfer portal and the way rosters turnover in college basketball year to year, its a lame excuse.

I think McMahon did just enough in year 2 to warrant a chance to prove himself in year 3. Its tournament or bust for McMahon next year. If he misses the tournament again, he needs to be shown the door.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter